Skip navigation

Mike blogged on these shockingly high numbers produced by IBM, Gartner et al and all I can do is applaud the fact that people are starting to wake up to what the lack of well managed end-to-end processes is costing us all.

And I mean us all; inefficiencies in the private sector mean products cost us more, in the public sector they mean higher taxes (and I know all too well what an inefficient public sector is like, I live in France.. ;-) ).

I find it astonishing that more companies don’t count the cost of process inefficiency; just because something might be difficult to measure and/or intangible does that mean it’s OK for management to abdicate responsibility for it?

Here’s a true anecdote from one of the vanishingly rare organizations that has tried to count the cost of this, which might illustrate the point:

A couple of years ago I was sitting with the Operations Director and Finance Director of a UK central government agency, budget of some £6 billion. The Ops guy said;

“We have a problem with process standardization. we have about 5500 people doing the same things in countless different ways”

When prompted to put a figure on the inefficiency he said;

“We did a quick and dirty project which highlighted that we were wasting between £300-500 million per year”

Gulp!

How many Boards of Directors would turn a blind eye to between 5-8% of physical stock somehow going missing from company warehouses every year??

Just because we can’t see process inefficiency doesn’t mean it’s not there…

About these ads

One Comment

  1. Dear Mark,

    Would you consider that BPM be another form of Taylorism?

    In both cases, it seems to me that you are looking for “The One Best Way”. In this case, just google Taylorism and variants to get some general arguments against BPM…

    Operating efficiency as you say, or I would say more frankly money, is what really matters here, not really humans. As far as I can see, and by experience, BPM is just a new business solution to achieve this operating efficiency by controlling workers.

    Kind regards,


One Trackback/Pingback

  1. [...] my challenge did elicit some good discussion, and also the note on Taylorism on following post (thanks Regis ) prompted some further thinking on my [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: